Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹.È£ÁÖ.´ºÁú·£µå Ä¡À§»ýÀü°ø ±³À°°úÁ¤ ¿î¿µ ºñ±³

Comparison of Korea, Australia and New Zealand dental hygiene curriculum operation

Çѱ¹±¸°­º¸°Ç°úÇÐȸÁö 2021³â 9±Ç 1È£ p.38 ~ 45
±èÀ¯¸°, ¹Ú½ÅÈ«, °­ÇعÌ, ¼º¹Ì°æ, °­Çö°æ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÀ¯¸° ( Kim Yu-Rin ) - Silla University Department of Dental Hygiene
¹Ú½ÅÈ« ( Park Shin-Hong ) - Silla University Department of Dental Hygiene
°­Çع̠( Kang Hae-Mi ) - Pusan National University School of Dentistry Department of Oral Anatomy
¼º¹Ì°æ ( Seong Mi-Gyung ) - Masan University Department of Dental Hygiene
°­Çö°æ ( Kang Hyun-Kyung ) - Silla University Department of Dental Hygiene

Abstract


Objectives: After comparing the operations of the dental hygiene curriculum in Australia, New Zealand, and Korea, this study attempted to find areas for improvement as well as possible complementary aspects in Korea¡¯s curriculum.

Methods: To compare the dental hygiene curriculums in Australia, New Zealand, and Korea, four universities in Australia, two universities in New Zealand, and 10 universities in Korea were selected.

Results: The curriculums in Australia and New Zealand were operated as integrated education by level, with various subjects that are related to clinical practice. By contrast, in Korea, specific subjects were taught every semester.

Conclusions: Through this study, it was confirmed that there is a need to revise the contents of the curriculum to demonstrate the competencies of Korean dental hygienists. It is necessary to conduct an in-depth examination of the direction of dental hygiene education in Korea and discuss the scope of work and competencies.

Å°¿öµå

Australia; Competency; Curriculum; Dental Hygienist; New Zealand

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI